<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Department Of The Interior Extends Deadline For Comments On Right-To-Carry In National Parks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/07/16/department-of-the-interior-extends-deadline-for-comments-on-right-to-carry-in-national-parks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/07/16/department-of-the-interior-extends-deadline-for-comments-on-right-to-carry-in-national-parks/</link>
	<description>Firearm information and politics from a gun rights perspective, with an emphasis on self defense rights.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:09:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/07/16/department-of-the-interior-extends-deadline-for-comments-on-right-to-carry-in-national-parks/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnaboutguns.com/?p=238#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts

http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3749

Most liberal Marin County Ca has repeatedly thumbed their nose at the US Constitution, then imposed their illegal actions onto a Nevada citizen. What&#039;s next? 

I was pleased to see the recent US Supreme Court ruling about gun control.  Along with others that are challenging previous court rulings and laws in light of the recent US Supreme Court ruling, one more challenge desperately needs to be immediately mounted.  That is the blanket all-inclusive law that a person with any sort of restraining order against them is not allowed to have any sort of a gun.  That is bad law and I have always believed that is unconstitutional.  It is also even worse law when the restraining order is obtained by default and a contemptible law when obtained through breaking the court’s own rules to get the default in the first place.  It is a gross denial of civil rights. 

In the Among Us stories I’ve been following, exactly that happened.  When husband is caught in bigamy living a double life, wife changes locks to Reno family home.  According to the Reno police report, that home is immediately violently broken into.  Two well-secured doors were broken down.  The second door was so well secured that the only way to get in was to break that door frame and surrounding sheet rock.  This is exactly what happened according to the witnesses, Reno police report and photographs.  It took 45 minutes to an hour to break through those two doors.  The garage door was then blocked shut.  The home is thoroughly ransacked, a knife is taken to their bed.  According to the Truckee Meadows Community College police and Pat Slavin, there is then an attempted break-in of wife’s locker at Truckee Meadows Community College.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts</p>
<p><a href="http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3749" rel="nofollow">http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3749</a></p>
<p>Most liberal Marin County Ca has repeatedly thumbed their nose at the US Constitution, then imposed their illegal actions onto a Nevada citizen. What&#8217;s next? </p>
<p>I was pleased to see the recent US Supreme Court ruling about gun control.  Along with others that are challenging previous court rulings and laws in light of the recent US Supreme Court ruling, one more challenge desperately needs to be immediately mounted.  That is the blanket all-inclusive law that a person with any sort of restraining order against them is not allowed to have any sort of a gun.  That is bad law and I have always believed that is unconstitutional.  It is also even worse law when the restraining order is obtained by default and a contemptible law when obtained through breaking the court’s own rules to get the default in the first place.  It is a gross denial of civil rights. </p>
<p>In the Among Us stories I’ve been following, exactly that happened.  When husband is caught in bigamy living a double life, wife changes locks to Reno family home.  According to the Reno police report, that home is immediately violently broken into.  Two well-secured doors were broken down.  The second door was so well secured that the only way to get in was to break that door frame and surrounding sheet rock.  This is exactly what happened according to the witnesses, Reno police report and photographs.  It took 45 minutes to an hour to break through those two doors.  The garage door was then blocked shut.  The home is thoroughly ransacked, a knife is taken to their bed.  According to the Truckee Meadows Community College police and Pat Slavin, there is then an attempted break-in of wife’s locker at Truckee Meadows Community College.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
