Comments on: Proposed IL Law Would Force Gun Owners to Carry $1,000,000.00 of Insurance http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2009/02/20/proposed-il-law-would-force-gun-owners-to-carry-100000000-of-insurance/ Firearm information and politics from a gun rights perspective, with an emphasis on self defense rights. Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:42:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: andy http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2009/02/20/proposed-il-law-would-force-gun-owners-to-carry-100000000-of-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-9661 andy Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:53:48 +0000 http://www.learnaboutguns.com/?p=1728#comment-9661 we already have to have a foid card, which as a former dispatcher , can be checked thru leads anytime the police want to know if your a real holder or a fake. what's the problem mayor ??????????? we already have to have a foid card, which as a former dispatcher , can be checked thru leads anytime the police want to know if your a real holder or a fake. what’s the problem mayor ???????????

]]> By: LTP http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2009/02/20/proposed-il-law-would-force-gun-owners-to-carry-100000000-of-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-6335 LTP Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:33:13 +0000 http://www.learnaboutguns.com/?p=1728#comment-6335 GOVT REQUIRED INSURANCE IS BAD - BAD -BAD AND HIS FACTS ARE FALSE - WRONG -FALSE... IT IS SO EASY FOR LAWMAKERS TO SAY "REQUIRED" BUT EVERY TIME "REQUIRED " IS USED IS HAS CONSEQUENCES BEYOND THE LAWMAKERS UNDERSTANDING LAWMAKERS HAVE LITTLE UNDERSTANDING... THEY ARE POORLY EDUCATED AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAWS THEY MAKE I WOULD LIKE TO SEE CCW INSURANCE AVAILABLE BUT NOT "REQUIRED" NOT "MANDATED" DONT YOU REALISE THAT YOU JUST CREATE A FEEDING FRENZY ..LIKE A BUNCH OF SHARKS ..BLOOD IN THE WATER...WHEN ATTORNEYS AND THE PUBLIC KNOW THERE IS A MILLION DOLLARS OF INSURANCE MONEY THERE TO BE ATTACKED ??! ..JEEZ LOUSIE...DONT YOU GET IT? ONLY THE FREEMARKET WILL DETERMINE IF WE GET FIREARM INSURANCE..IF THERE IS AN ACTUARIALLY DEFINED BODY OF AT LEAST TEN MILLION CCW HOLDERS WITH LESS THAT 3% PAYOUT CAN THERE BE CCW INSURANCE. LAWMAKERS NEED TO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS...NOT "REQUIRED" NOT "MANDATE" BESIDES..WHERE DOES THIS NUMBNUTS GET HIS DATA? HIS QUOTES OF DEATHS ARE FALSE...FALSE ..FALSE REFER TO STUDIES DONE BY ..WRITE THIS DOWN... PROF GARY KLECK..."POINT BLANK".. PROF JOHN LOTT...."MORE GUNS LESS CRIME" GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT...THE NUMBERS OF GUN RELATED DEATHS ARE FAR LESS AND FAR BETTER DEFINED...IN THESE- AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS... LAWMAKERS DO NOT STUDY ENOUGH ABOUT WHAT THEY DO AND THE UNSEEN CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR LAWS. SO ..IN RE CCW INS... THOU SHALT MAKE NO MANDATES THOU SHALT MAKE NO GIRLDATES EITHER THOU SHALT NOT REQUIRE CCW INSURANCE.. THOU SHALT LET THE MARKET DO IT... YOU WOULD NOT MAKE CCW MANDATORY, WOULD YOU? SO DONT MAKE CCW INSURANCE MANDATROY..GOT IT? IF SOME HAVE IT AND SOME DONT...IT DOES NOT GIVE THE BAD GUYS A BASKET OF MONEY TO KNOW ABOUT...GOT IT?...LAWMAKERS..WE GOT ENOUGH LAWS WE DONT NEED ANY MORE...START BY REPEALING ALL OF THE CLINTON ERA BRADY BILLS...AND DISBAND THE BATFE ..ALCHOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS ..EXPLOSIVES...SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD CORNER STORE AT FOURTH OF JULY...NOT AN AGENCY TO DESTROY SMALL BUSINESS...FOLLOW THE VERMONT MODEL.. NO ANTI GUN LAWS..NO PERMITS ..THEY JUST ENFORCE NORMAL LAWS..BE NICE ..DONT HURT ANYBODY..DONT STEAL..DONT DO BAD THINGS.. IF YOU DO WE WILL %$%$ YOU UP. NO MANDATED GUN INSURANCE.. JUST OPTIONAL IF WE WANT IT .. NOT YOUR JOB TO TELL US WHAT TO DO..GOT IT? OUT LTP GOVT REQUIRED INSURANCE IS BAD – BAD -BAD
AND HIS FACTS ARE FALSE – WRONG -FALSE…
IT IS SO EASY FOR LAWMAKERS TO SAY “REQUIRED”
BUT EVERY TIME “REQUIRED ” IS USED IS HAS
CONSEQUENCES BEYOND THE LAWMAKERS UNDERSTANDING
LAWMAKERS HAVE LITTLE UNDERSTANDING…
THEY ARE POORLY EDUCATED AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAWS THEY MAKE

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE CCW INSURANCE AVAILABLE
BUT NOT “REQUIRED” NOT “MANDATED”
DONT YOU REALISE THAT YOU JUST CREATE A FEEDING FRENZY ..LIKE A BUNCH OF SHARKS ..BLOOD IN THE WATER…WHEN ATTORNEYS AND THE PUBLIC KNOW THERE IS A MILLION DOLLARS OF INSURANCE MONEY THERE TO BE ATTACKED ??!
..JEEZ LOUSIE…DONT YOU GET IT?
ONLY THE FREEMARKET WILL DETERMINE IF WE GET FIREARM INSURANCE..IF THERE IS AN ACTUARIALLY DEFINED BODY OF AT LEAST TEN MILLION CCW HOLDERS WITH LESS THAT 3% PAYOUT CAN THERE BE
CCW INSURANCE. LAWMAKERS NEED TO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS…NOT “REQUIRED” NOT “MANDATE”
BESIDES..WHERE DOES THIS NUMBNUTS GET HIS DATA?
HIS QUOTES OF DEATHS ARE FALSE…FALSE ..FALSE
REFER TO STUDIES DONE BY ..WRITE THIS DOWN…
PROF GARY KLECK…”POINT BLANK”..
PROF JOHN LOTT….”MORE GUNS LESS CRIME”
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT…THE NUMBERS OF GUN RELATED DEATHS ARE FAR LESS AND FAR BETTER DEFINED…IN THESE- AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS…
LAWMAKERS DO NOT STUDY ENOUGH ABOUT WHAT THEY
DO AND THE UNSEEN CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR LAWS.
SO ..IN RE CCW INS…
THOU SHALT MAKE NO MANDATES
THOU SHALT MAKE NO GIRLDATES EITHER
THOU SHALT NOT REQUIRE CCW INSURANCE..
THOU SHALT LET THE MARKET DO IT…
YOU WOULD NOT MAKE CCW MANDATORY, WOULD YOU?
SO DONT MAKE CCW INSURANCE MANDATROY..GOT IT?
IF SOME HAVE IT AND SOME DONT…IT DOES NOT GIVE THE BAD GUYS A BASKET OF MONEY TO KNOW ABOUT…GOT IT?…LAWMAKERS..WE GOT ENOUGH LAWS
WE DONT NEED ANY MORE…START BY REPEALING ALL OF THE CLINTON ERA BRADY BILLS…AND DISBAND
THE BATFE ..ALCHOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS ..EXPLOSIVES…SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD CORNER STORE
AT FOURTH OF JULY…NOT AN AGENCY TO DESTROY SMALL BUSINESS…FOLLOW THE VERMONT MODEL..
NO ANTI GUN LAWS..NO PERMITS ..THEY JUST ENFORCE NORMAL LAWS..BE NICE ..DONT HURT ANYBODY..DONT STEAL..DONT DO BAD THINGS..
IF YOU DO WE WILL %$%$ YOU UP.
NO MANDATED GUN INSURANCE..
JUST OPTIONAL IF WE WANT IT ..
NOT YOUR JOB TO TELL US WHAT TO DO..GOT IT?

OUT
LTP

]]>