Skip to content
LearnAboutGuns.com
LearnAboutGuns.com

Firearms information and politics, witih an emphasis on lawful self defense

  • Home
  • Guns 101
  • Gun Reviews
  • Gun News
  • Pro-Gun Articles
  • Prepping
  • Police & Racism
LearnAboutGuns.com

Firearms information and politics, witih an emphasis on lawful self defense

July 1, 2009

Anti Hunting Bias in the Bar/Bri Bar Exam Review Course

As I mentioned, I’m now studying for the bar exam. Like many if not most law students, I paid for a $3,000+ bar review course that is offered by a company called Bar/Bri.  It reviews the areas of the law that the bar exam tests, and takes about two months to complete.  In the course of his Constitutional Law II lecture, Professor Paul Lisnek injected some rather disappointing and totally unnecessary anti-hunting bias:In the process of discussing the constitutionality of charging out of state hunters more for a license than in-state hunters, Professor Lisnek repeatedly referred to hunting as “elk murder,”  and went on to say “elk hunting, or murder as I think of it.”

Firstly, I find this to be a distraction from the lecture which I paid quite a bit of money to hear.  I signed up to hear Professor Lisnek’s approximately 6 hour summary of constitutional law as it applies to the bar exam – not his unsolicited opinion on hunting.  It was completely unnecessary for him to inject that bit of bias into the lecture.  It is bad enough when a law professor takes one side of an issue, rather than sticking to the law and fostering debate on the part of his or her students.  It strikes me as worse when a law professor does this in a lecture setting like Bar/Bri, where no questions can be asked during the lecture, and where the recorded lecture is listened to by thousands of students who hear only the professor’s viewpoints.

Secondly, I would like to note that he offered no comment on other contentious issues such as abortion, racist hate speech, flag burning, gay marriage, or assisted suicide.  Indeed, when discussing the constitutionality of laws criminalizing the creation and  possession of child pornography, Lisnek  didn’t take time from the lecture to condemn the individuals who exploit children.

Finally, I would note that I am not a hunter, and have never been hunting.  I own few guns suitable for hunting purposes, since my main reason for gun ownership is self defense.  My thoughts on the unfair bias against hunting, from that perspective, can be seen in this article.

Pro Gun Rights Articles

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Racism, The NRA, And Gun Owners

August 25, 2008

The short answer: The NRA is not racist, otherwise I and many of my fellow…

Read More

Lack of Uniformity Shows the Injustice of Gun Control

June 18, 2010

As I’ve repeatedly and happily mentioned, last year I moved to Iowa and received a…

Read More

The “Minimum Needs” Gun Control Tactic

August 29, 2008

When discussing gun ownership rights and laws, I’ve heard some people argue in favor of…

Read More

Categories

  • Contact the Author
  • Gun and Accessory Reviews
  • Gun Related News
  • Guns 101
  • Help Protect Our Gun Rights
  • How-To Guides and Other Info
  • Links
  • Police & Racism
  • Pro Gun Rights Articles
  • Video Clips
.
©2022 LearnAboutGuns.com | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes