“Heavily-Armed Cartel Attacks Mexican Army; Weapons Used Show U.S. Gun Laws Not To Blame”

Published by the LearnAboutGuns.com Author on April 5, 2010 at 12:01 pm
LearnAboutGuns.com > Pro Gun Rights Articles > “Heavily-Armed Cartel Attacks Mexican Army; Weapons Used Show U.S. Gun Laws Not To Blame”

Below is an excellent article from the NRA, which further debunks the myth that American gun laws are responsible for the ongoing violence in Mexico:

At the end of March, troops of a major drug cartel launched a series of attacks on military personnel and installations in a half dozen cities in the northern Mexican states of Nueva Leon and Tamaulipas. Fortunately, things did not work out as the narco-thugs had hoped. At least 18 of them are now taking the kind of siesta from which there is no awakening and, at last count, only one Mexican soldier was injured.

Contrary to the notion that the cartels depend on semi-automatic rifles bought illegally in the United States, the cartel conducted its attacks with a variety of weapons that cannot be legally bought anywhere in our country. As the Los Angeles Times reported, “In coordinated attacks, gunmen in armored cars and equipped with grenade launchers fought army troops this week. . . . The army said it confiscated armored cars, grenade launchers, about 100 military-grade grenades, [and] explosive devices” in addition to a large quantity of ammunition.

Contrast that reality with the fiction perpetuated by politicians on both sides of the border. NRA members certainly recall that soon after President Obama took office last year, Attorney General Eric Holder stated his support for an “assault weapon” ban as the solution to Mexico’s drug violence. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.), the sponsor of the federal “assault weapon” ban in 1993, soon called upon President Obama to support the Inter-American Convention Against Illegal Arms Trafficking, claiming, “According to the Mexican government, about 90 percent of the weapons they seize from Mexican drug cartels came into the country illegally from the United States.” Newspapers around the country fell for the ruse hook, line and sinker, parroting the 90 percent claim, as well as the utterly absurd, mathematically impossible claim that 2,000 guns cross from the U.S. into Mexico each day.

Apoplectic anti-gun members of Congress held dozens of hearings on the Mexico situation, including field hearings along the border. At one dog and pony show in El Paso, former Democrat Party presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (Mass.) obligatorily called for a ban on the importation of “assault weapons,” a ban already imposed in 1989 by the BATF (as it was then known), apparently without Sen. Kerry’s knowledge. In fact, at a hearing on Capitol Hill, Sen. Feinstein nearly burst a blood vessel when a witness refused to support her belief that 2,000 guns crossed the border every day.

U.S. politicians have since maintained a low profile on the issue, fearful of the potential for a backlash at the polls in November. Last month, however, Mexico’s president, Felipe Calderon, complained that “there are more than 10,000 gun stores along the American border with Mexico. . . . So, the United States must stop the flow of assault weapons to Mexico.”

The claim is no more true today than when it was first floated a year ago. As we have noted, most of the guns that Mexico has seized from the cartels and asked the BATFE to trace (because markings on those particular firearms indicated that they came from the U.S.) represent only a small percentage of guns that Mexico has seized.

This was stated, though not clearly, in a Government Accountability Office report last summer (see document pages 14-15). However, lest anyone be misled by GAO’s lack of thoroughness on this point, the Department of Homeland Security, in an appendix to the GAO’s report (see page 69), set the record straight.

“DHS officials separately question the statistic involving the origination of weapons as currently presented by GAO,” DHS said. “GAO asserts that, ‘Available evidence suggests most firearms recovered in Mexico come from U.S. gun dealers, and many support Drug Trafficking Organizations.’ and fuel Mexican drug violence. Using the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) eTrace data, GAO determined that about 87 percent of firearms seized by Mexican authorities and traced from fiscal years 2004 to 2008 originated in the United States. DHS officials believe that the 87 percent statistic is misleading as the reference should include the number of weapons that could not be traced (i.e., out of approximately 30,000 weapons seized in Mexico, approximately 4,000 could be traced and 87 percent of those—3,480—originated in the United States.) Numerous problems with the data collection and sample population render this assertion as unreliable.”

In the early part of the 20th century, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” That is certainly the case in this story. As the vast scope of the Mexican drug cartels’ multi-million dollar arsenals is incrementally uncovered, the attempt by opponents of the right to arms to use Mexico’s problem as the excuse for restricting Second Amendment rights has fallen flat.

And to Mexico’s soldiers who obliterated the cartels’ punks and thugs last week, we say “buen tiro” (translation: “Good shooting”).

Unarmed Self Defense and Disaster Preparedness e-books:

Tags for this article: , , , , , , ,

  • Herrbaggs

    As long as this [unnecessary profanity redacted] keeps up we as a country will never achieve what is important to upgrade our lives and standard of living. What ever has happened to the truth and facing problems and finding real solutions for them. Quite a few Americans seem to have gotten their heads stuck while giving them selves DIY bowel inspections. The real issue is not guns it is people control.

    • Herrbaggs

      I don't think BS is profanity, in fact I know it is not. It is the correct description for our so called leaderless leaders. BFS is profanity.

      • https://www.learnaboutguns.com The LearnAboutGuns.c

        As mentioned in the terms of service, I block profanity (including the full version of "BS") because I don't want to give schools, workplaces, and the website filtering companies that they use an excuse to blacklist this website.

        Note: I'm not personally offended by profanity. In fact, I think that the English language isn't expressive enough, and that we need more (rather than fewer) words for use in everyday conversation…

        • Herrbaggs

          Verbal profanity won't be the reason they block this web site it will be because they don't want anybody to learn about guns. All schools and liberal democrats business consider guns to be the most vile profanity. Gun people don't care. But I agree with you we don't want anybody to get the idea that we would really use our guns if given life threatening provocation. That some how would make us evil. I would like to point something out. I am a decent person but do not want to be referred to as a law abiding citizen, I will not abide by laws that I do not believe in because they are inherently bad. All it takes is good common sense and if the majority of Americans would shake of their lethargy a bunch of these nonsensical redundant laws might go away. But I could be wrong!

          • https://www.learnaboutguns.com The LearnAboutGuns.c

            Actually, I have seen this site banned for profanity (at least that was the excuse given, which I can tell by looking at server logs to see hits from blocking software, which sometimes gives the reason for the ban as part of the referring URL).

            Whether or not they would have banned this site for other reasons, I can't say. But, I prefer to err on the side of caution and not give them a(nother?) reason to ban this site.

          • Jason

            Hey now, not all of us Liberal Democrats buy into the gun control BS. Just because some hippies and spineless politicians in the party take things too far doesn't mean we're all that way. There are Democrat members of the NRA you know. There are Democrats with concealed weapons permits. We're all Americans, some of us just don't know our rights.