A convicted felon from Florida was facing up to 15 years in prison, after he used his girlfriend’s gun to stop a violent home invader. However, the state prosecutor recently decided not to proceed with the charges. The details of that case, and my thoughts on the matter in general, can be seen below:
The facts of the case
According to news reports, 25 year old Lamar Coaston returned to his Melbourne, FL home – as a burglary was in progress. Coaston, who was attacked by the burglar, grabbed his girlfriend’s gun and fired in self defense, striking the intruder and saving himself, according to reports. Unfortunately for Coaston, he is a convicted felon, and was alleged to have violated the Florida law that bans convicted felons from possessing firearms. Luckily for Coaston, the State’s Attorney’s office decided not to purse charges, after concluding that “even convicted felons have the right to use deadly force in their home when confronted with a threat to their lives.”
As I’ve previously stated, I don’t think that an absolute ban on gun possession by convicted felons is reasonable. I reach this conclusion for a variety of reasons:
Firstly, there are many felonies that don’t seem, in any way, to suggest that the person is more likely to be violent or misuse a gun. For example, passing a stopped school bus is a felony in some states, as is online gambling. I can’t say I have any objection to a law that bans murderers from owning guns; however, banning everyone who is ever convicted of a felony from owning guns is simply overly broad and unreasonable..
Secondly, along the same lines as my first point, there are simply more felonies today than ever before. At common law, there were relatively few felonies – murder, rape, arson, burglary, kidnapping, theft, etc. With the rise of the modern criminal codes, the number of felony offenses has expanded exponentially, as politicians get “tough on crime.”
Thirdly, blanket bans on gun ownership by convicted felons result in grave injustice. This case is just one example of the countless cases where a person is made to decide whether they will use a gun in self defense and risk jail, or forgo the gun and risk losing their life. That is simply unjust.
Fourthly, the ban on gun ownership by convicted felons appears to be quite ineffective at preventing felons from committing crimes. Examples from this website, as well as the examples that appear in the news each day, make clear the fact that felons who want a gun are not deterred by a law that tells them to remain unarmed. This shouldn’t come as a surprise, since a person who is willing to risk being sent to prison for murder/rape/robbery won’t fear a gun possession charge.
I applaud the prosecutor’s decisions not to pursue charges in this case.