Robbery Victim Shot 3 Times for having Only $12

Published by the LearnAboutGuns.com Author on July 31, 2010 at 12:01 am
LearnAboutGuns.com > Pro Gun Rights Articles > Robbery Victim Shot 3 Times for having Only $12

A Chicago man was reportedly shot three times by an armed robber for having only $12 to give up:

Your money or your life? It’s an easy question to answer. But a Chicago man apparently didn’t have enough cash to keep from getting shot. . . His wife says he tried to hand over his $12 to an armed robber, but a witness says the suspect pulled the trigger anyway — and threw the money back. . . He was shot three times. One bullet severed an artery. Another went straight through his stomach. [The robbery victim has undergone multiple surgeries to repair the damage from his 3 gunshot wounds, and remains hospitalized.]

Cases where a victim does exactly what a robber demands, only to be shot, are not uncommon.  Although I don’t make any special effort to track such cases, I’ve written about several already:  This cooperative woman was shot by robbers after they successfully grabbed her off the street and helped themselves to the money in her pocket.  As another example, this cooperative deli owner was shot in chest multiple times by robbers who weren’t satisfied with the amount of money in his cash register.  Similarly, this cooperative bakery worker was shot by robbers, after they realized the bakery didn’t have a large safe full of money for them to steal.  As a further example, this cooperative man was shot by armed robbers who broke in to home, only to be disappointed that his belongings weren’t worth stealing.  As a final example, this cooperative man was shot by an armed robber who was angered by his lack of cash to steal.

ALSO READ:  Obama's Gun Control Plans

Armed robbers harm victims – including those who fully cooperate – for a variety of reasons: The robber may decide that killing the victim is an effective way to ensure that the victim can’t go to the police or testify against the robber in court.  Another reason could be that the robber is simply a violent person who enjoys harming others, and doesn’t wish to pass up the opportunity to inflict harm.  Or, the robber could be a gang member who as been instructed to kill a person as part of their gang initiation. Another reason, which seems to come up often, is that a robber is disappointed by the small amount of money in the victim’s possession and shoots the victim to express that frustration.  In still other cases, it seems that the robber doesn’t intend to shoot the victim, but handles their gun in such a negligent way that the victim is shot.  Regardless of the reason, the end result is the same for the victim: death or serious bodily harm.

On the other hand, armed citizens are in the best possible position to defend themselves.  Rather than having to hope that the robber will show mercy, such citizens use their guns to stop violent robbers every day.  They also stop home invaders, armed robbers, rapists, kidnappers, burglars, terrorists, stalkers, racist attackers, and every other type of violent criminal that preys upon innocent people.

ALSO READ:  My Response to a Comment on the San Bernardino Terrorist Attack

Sadly, Illinois residents such as this crime victim are denied the right to carry a gun for self defense.  Criminals, being criminals, ignore such gun control laws the same way that they ignore the law against robbery.  The result is that the violent criminals – such as the ones who will shoot an innocent person for not having more than $12 to hand over – are armed, while their law abiding victims are defenseless.

Tags for this article: , , , , , ,